<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Strict//EN"
"http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-strict.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" lang="en" xml:lang="en">
<head>
<!-- 2020-04-13 Mon 16:40 -->
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html;charset=utf-8" />
<title>Emacs Always</title>
<meta name="generator" content="Org mode" />
<meta name="author" content="Kevin &quot;The Nuclear&quot; Bloom" />
<link rel='stylesheet' href='/../styles/main.css' />
</head>
<body>
<div id="preamble" class="status">
<header id="banner">
  <h1><a href="/home.html">Kevin "The Nuclear" Bloom</a></h1>
  <hr />
  <nav><ul>
    <li><a href="/contact.html">Contact</a></li>
    <li><a href="/blog/blog.html">Blog</a></li>
    <li><a href="/projects.html">Projects</a></li>
    <li><a href="/about-me.html">About Me</a></li>
  </ul></nav>
</header>
</div>
<div id="content">
<h1 class="title">Emacs Always</h1>
<div class="PREVIEW">
<p>
Have you ever been so touched by a program that it changes the way you think?
The way you do work? The way you live your life? Well, all of these questions
get a big fat <i>yes</i> to most people who use the advanced text editor, <a href="https://gnu.org/software/emacs">GNU
Emacs</a>. Most advanced test editor users could probably say yes to <i>some</i>, if not
<i>all</i> of those questions too. However, there is a big difference between an
Emacs users' and most other editor users' reasoning. Before I can explain why
their reasoning is different, I have to first explain how Emacs differs from
other advanced editors.
</p>

<p>
To be continued&#x2026;
</p>

</div>
</div>
</body>
</html>
